06.28.07
More Mad Medicine
After writing my post yesterday on the book When Medicine Went Mad, I remembered a website I stumbled upon months ago called Guinea Pig Zero. Actually, that’s also the name of a book edited by Robert Helms, the full title being Guinea Pig Zero: An Anthology of the Journal for Medical Research Subjects. Included in that book is the story of Jessie Gelsinger written by his father, Paul Gelsinger. The story caught my eye because I remember hearing briefly on the news years ago of some “genetic” experiment gone wrong. This was actually just before or shortly after my AA diagnosis. It appeared that Gelsinger was the boy of whom that story was about. Apparently, he had some problems which they felt could be corrected with gene therapy. All seemed in order, that is, Jessie was of legal age and gave his informed consent based on the information he was provided. However, what was later found was that the information he was given was not only misleading, but false. Below is an excerpt of what was told to Jessie prior to his submitting to the clinical trial.
“He then explained that the most recent patient had shown a 50% increase in her ability to excrete ammonia following gene therapy. My reaction was to say, “Wow Mark! This really works. . .”
Then after Jessie’s death, the following was discovered:
“. . . It wasn’t until that three-day meeting that I discovered that there was never any efficacy in humans. I had believed this was working based on my conversations with Mark Batshaw and that is why I defended Penn for so long. These men could not go in front of their peers at the RAC meeting in Bethesda and say this was working. After Penn and the FDA made their presentations on Dec. 9, I asked for a lunch meeting with the FDA, NIH and the Penn doctors.
The full article can be read here.
I’m not one of those who likes to use my self as a guinea pig, so it always amazes me when I read of people signing up for clinical trials. Lots of people who do sign up have some sort of incurable disease, so they figure they might as well help in the struggle to find a cure. Okay, I can “kinda” understand that, but I still didn’t think it was a good idea for a “sick” person to be testing out all these weird drugs and procedures. Then I found that some of the early tests are actually done on “healthy” individuals, ack! I wondered, “Why would a healthy person take any of these drugs?” Turns out some people are paid to test out these drugs and willingly submit themselves to them. That’s a really weird concept to me, but apparently lots of people do it. And that reminds me of a Jim Carrey movie, Fun with Dick and Jane. In that movie Jane needed some extra cash, so she goes to one of those facilities that use volunteers to test out some cosmetic implant substances. She ends up with a reaction where her lip got swollen like it had been stung by an army of mosquitoes, ha ha! It’s funny to watch in a movie, but must be horrifying in real life. There was an article months back, maybe a year ago or more now where these healthy guys submitted themselves to some new drug. Shortly after being injected these guys were screaming in pain. I forget the details, but a couple of them ended up in critical condition. I recall one patient’s head swelled up so big that he was screaming in pain, ack! Unfortunately, I never did see a followup article on that. What happened to those guys? I wonder how many people submit themselves to new drug tests each day? What are the results? Weird stuff going on in this world. . .
Marlakins
Kim said,
July 1, 2007 at 1:42 pm
Ugh…Medical field, how about Lasik surgery! So many people are being the subject of an experiment to determine if the outcome how long this procedure will last. Lifetime? Temporary? I know for a fact the results vary, but I wouldn’t know unless I looked into further at the expense of many people’s eyesight.
It is crazy, Miss Marla! I agree. Oh, my computer crashed and I have a new one, but do not recall your entire email address… when you have time will you send to me an email? Thanks! And thank you for all of your blog! I enjoy it so much.
Administrator said,
July 4, 2007 at 7:12 am
Hey, Kim! Thanks for dropping by and commenting! I sent you an email, so hopefully you have my addy again, now.
Regarding the guinea pig stuff, yeah, it happens quite a bit. In a way whenever there’s something new, there’s gonna be a guinea pig, but some of it just seems to be done so underhandedly that it’s seems unconscionable. Your mentioning the lasik brings another example to mind–the contrast dyes based on gadolinium. Iodine was the common contrast dye for radiology, but they found it to be toxic to the kidneys. So then they introduced gadolinium as a contrast dye claiming it was safe on the kidneys. Well, then we start reading articles claiming that they are finding that gadolinium does have a negative effect on the kidneys. One would wonder why those claims are popping up, then we find out that, “There exist no randomized studies comparing the nephrotoxic effects of gadolinium-based and iodinated media at equal-attenuating concentrations and doses.” That remark was copied from http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/223/2/311 Gee, if there were no trials comparing the toxic effects of gadolinium vs iodine on the kidneys, then “why” have they been telling people that gadolinium is safer than iodine? What’s the basis of their conclusion that gadolinum was safe on the kidneys? That’s the kind of negligent information that just increases my distrust for the medical community. They expect us to trust and respect them, but they just seem to keep pulling those kinds of stunts.
Anyway, look forward to hearing from you again, and have a fun-filled 4th!
Marla