I really enjoyed your critique of the article as well as I was think along the same lines–the author was essentially oblivious to the fact that God is much more capable than we are. If God created us and all the universe, and as we know there is still so much that is unknown about the human body and the universe, it’s only logical that God is infinitely more intelligent than we are and obviously knows a lot more than we do. To think that author believes that just because “the brain reaction’s electrical potentials can be recorded only by special sensors on the scalp in shielded rooms” that God can’t possibly detect those electrical reactions is assuming to know what God’s limitations are. The most advanced computers today do not equal the God’s creation of the brain. Obviously there is still a large knowledge deficit on our part regarding the workings of the brain, and this guy has that audacity to conclude what God can and can not do? Ha! And to say that there are too many languages in the world for God to understand?! Ha ha! God was the author of all those languages! When men were scattered from the Tower of Babel it was written that “God confused our languages.” Are we to think that verbal languages are more complicated to God than all that is required to create man, the universe, and all the creatures on Earth?

Rather than rail too much on that article (it would take up too much space here), I give it a hearty laugh and two thumbs down. But two thumbs up on your critique. . .

Marlakins